Færsluflokkur: Viðskipti og fjármál

Sunday Times - Rich List 2010

1. Patrick McKenna (Media financier), £520m

2. JK Rowling (Author), £519m

3. Simon Fuller (TV entrepreneur), £350m

4. Mark Burnett and Roma Downey (TV producers), £240m

5. Elisabeth Murdoch and Matthew Freud (TV exec/PR),  £190m

6. Nigel and Trevor Green (Film distributors), £189m

7. Arpad Busson and Uma Thurman (Financier/actress), £180m

8. Catherine Zeta-Jones and Michael Douglas (Actors), £175m

9. Simon Cowell (TV producer), £165m

10. Sir Ridley and Tony Scott (Film directors), £110m

11. Ozzy and Sharon Osbourne (TV celebrities), £95m

12. Kishmore Lulla and family (Film distributor), £84m

13. Lord Alli (TV producer), £80m

14. Sir Sean Connery (Actor), £80m

15. Judy Craymer (Film and theatre producer), £80m

16. Tracey Ullman and Allan McKeown (Actress/TV producer), £75m

17. Rowan Atkinson (Comedian), £70m

18. Daniel Radcliffe (Actor), £42m

19. Keira Knightley (Actress), £28m

20. Emma Watson (Actress), £22m


Jón Ásgeir og Ingibjörg ákærð um svínslega hegðun í NEW YORK

Posh Icelandic couple sued for putting IKEA kitchen in swank Gramercy Park Hotel pad

A view of the lobby in the Ian Schrager building at 50 Gramercy Park North - the Gramercy Park Hotel.
A view of the lobby in the Ian Schrager building at 50 Gramercy Park North - the Gramercy Park Hotel.
A loft at the Gramercy Park Hotel.
A loft at the Gramercy Park Hotel.

A glamorous Icelandic couple is being sued for installing cheap Swedish furniture - Ikea, gasp! - in their pad at the Gramercy Park Hotel.

Viking mogul Jon Asgeir Johannesson and his stylish designer bride, Ingibjorg Palmadottir, are accused of installing an "ugly" kitchen from the superstore in their 16th-floor pad at the Ian Schrager building at 50 Gramercy Park North.

Johannesson and Palmadottir reportedly paid more than $10 million for the full-floor co-op in 2007, and bought the duplex penthouse above it a few months later.

Now they're now charged with cutting corners when they agreed to rent out the 16th floor for $312,000 last year to something called the Paramount Realty Group.

"Defendants willfully installed what [Jon Asgeir Johannesson] defined as an 'ugly' kitchen," the suit says.

"The kitchen installed is manufactured by Ikea, which is generally known to offer low budget furniture."

And that's just not cutting it.

"The kitchen installed was not reasonably satisfactory...as it did not rise to the level of a kitchen suitable for a property located at 50 Gramercy Park North," the suit says.

"The kitchen has also been a source of embarrassment for Plaintiff and the subject of remarks by guests."

A Web site for 50 Gramercy Park North boasts that each unit is outfitted with "John Pawson custom-designed bathrooms and kitchens, and the chic refinement of white oak floors, cherry wood and travertine surfaces."

A lawyer for Paramount Realty Group, Andrea Fiocchi, declined to comment and it was unclear how the apartment was used.

The suit says the couple also left behind faulty air conditioning, a cracked window, missing shower parts and missing appliances.

It charges that in July 2009, Paramount's guests suffered the indignity of chewed-up chicken wings being dropped onto their 16th-floor terrace from the couple's duplex above.

The terraces at the luxury building are about 2,000 square feet. Paramount is seeking $52,000 in damages.

Johannesson is a retail mogul who flirted with buying the Saks department store chain before Iceland's economy collapsed.

The couple could not immediately be reached for comment.

DN

Wealthy Couple Sued For Installing Ikea Kitchen

phpUJ3R44PM.jpg A wealthy Icelandic couple is being sued for installing a cheap Ikea kitchen in their Gramercy Park Hotel pad. According to the Daily News, Jon Asgeir Johannesson and Ingibjorg Palmadottir own two apartments in the building, a full-floor co-op and the duplex penthouse above it. The duo rented out the 16th floor to the Paramount Realty Group last year, and now that group is suing them for $52,000, in part because of the "ugly kitchen."

The suit claims that the kitchen "was not reasonably satisfactory... as it did not rise to the level of a kitchen suitable for a property located at 50 Gramercy Park North. The kitchen has also been a source of embarrassment for Plaintiff and the subject of remarks by guests." Rich people!

On top of the design faux pas, the suit also claims the unit had faulty air conditioning, a cracked window and missing appliances... as well as chewed up chicken wings on the 2,000-square-foot terrace! Allegedly they were being tossed there by the couple themselves, who reside above.


Disney kaupir Marvel Entertainment

disney-marvel-2

As you probably know by now, the big entertainment news of the day is The Walt Disney Company buying Marvel Entertainment. Shortly after the $4 billion dollar deal was announced, a shareholder conference call was held to explain some of the details. If you didn’t have a chance to sit through the call yourself, don’t worry, as we’ve got you covered. Below you will find our quick guide to what is going on — based on the information we have in front of us.

1. Disney has an “If it ain’t broke…” viewpoint toward Marvel Studios. Walt Disney President Bob Iger said specifically that Disney will have an “if it ain’t broke…” attitude when it comes to the future of Marvel films. All of the creative control — including use of 3D, which characters will get movies, etc — will remain in the hands of the people who know the Marvel Universe best: the people at Marvel. Sure, this might change down the road, but the initial sentiment is that Disney does not intend to come in and take control of Marvel’s creative world.

2. All previous deals are still in place. Paramount is still going to distribute up to five more Marvel Studios films, including Thor, The First Avenger: Captain America, Iron Man 2 and The Avengers. The also could still distribute an Ant-Man movie. As well, there are still existing deals in which other studios hold the cinematic rights to certain characters. Those are not changing. So Spider-Man is staying at Sony, X-Men is staying with Fox, and so on. Disney intends to bring those characters back in-house at some point, but there’s no indication that it will be happening anytime soon.

3. John Lasseter has met with Marvel about a Pixar team-up. Executives stated that not only has John Lasseter, the man behind Pixar and now Disney Animation, already met with the folks at Marvel, but that they were also so excited that they had to be told to calm down. The meaning here is simple: something is brewing between Marvel and Pixar, and there’s no way that can be a bad thing.

4. Disney is a brand machine. From a film marketing standpoint — and for that matter, a brand marketing standpoint — Disney is a powerhouse. Pirate of the Caribbean, the films of Pixar and all the way down to television with shows such as Lost via their ownership of ABC, Disney knows how to sell a brand. And selling the Marvel brand means more Marvel fans, more recognition in the mainstream and for those of us keeping score, more money down the road to make Marvel movies.

5. Disney backing means Marvel budgets. Disney is a smart company. During the conference call they said, in effect, that their goal is to shine a brighter light on Marvel. Which likely means marketing dollars, added funding for development and (hopefully) increased marketshare. With big Daddy Disney backing them up financially, Marvel will be able to operate at a higher level. Assuming creative control stays the same (which appears to be the case), Marvel fans can only count on more of what they love from their favorite brand.

6. A lot of details are yet to be hashed out. One very important thing to keep in mind is that there will be a great gestation period here. Marvel Entertainment has a lot of existing deals — theme parks, movie distribution, etc. — and all of those contract will be honored by Disney. It will take them a long time to reign in the Marvel Universe and obtain full creative control.

As you can see, there are good intentions all around — Disney doesn’t want to screw up their $4 billion dollar purchase, so its likely that they will let the highly profitable Marvel Studios do their thing. The questions don’t arise until far down the line, when Disney begins to take back the rights to Marvel characters. How will they handle these franchises? How many movies will they release per year? All of these questions are yet to be answered, and may not be answered for a long time. At this point, all we can say is that this deal appears to be a good one for Marvel.


Hvað !

What's 6 inches long , 2 inches wide, and thrills women?


Money!


Pæling


Næsta síða »

Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikið á Javascript til að hefja innskráningu.

Hafðu samband